Editor’s Note : Views in the article do not necessarily reflect the views of borkena.com
Nama Nekemto
General Tefera Mamo’s recent comments, while not definitively representing the stance of Fano, warrant careful consideration due to his close ties to the group. His interview raises important questions that deserve thorough analysis, especially considering the widely known atrocities committed by the TPLF against the Amhara people. The TPLF has consistently obstructed the Amhara people’s organized efforts to fight for their rights, a historical reality dating back to the TPLF’s inception. The organization’s deep-seated animosity towards the Amhara people is undeniable.
The Fano fighters, currently organized and armed, engaging in conflict against Abiy Ahmed’s army, have themselves suffered greatly under the TPLF’s oppressive regime. The recent TPLF offensive two years ago resulted in significant losses within Fano ranks. Fano and veteran Amhara militias played a crucial role in reclaiming territories such as Welkait, Tsegede, and Raya, historically considered Amhara lands. Furthermore, their pivotal role in repelling TPLF incursions in Wollo, Shewa, and Gondar, while the Abiy Ahmed’s army retreated, is well documented.
Therefore, to equate the relationship between Fano and the TPLF to that of the former Amhara National Democratic Movement (ANDM) and TPLF is a gross oversimplification. The comparison is as disparate as heaven and earth. Even if a relationship were to form, it is highly improbable that the TPLF would supplant Fano’s role in the manner the ANDM was subservient to the TPLF. Fano, currently forging its narrative through blood and struggle, is highly unlikely to repeat the history of subjugation and subservience experienced by the ANDM.
Based solely on General Tefera Mamo’s comments, suggesting Fano will become another ANDM, selling the Amhara struggle to the TPLF and Shabia, is not only inaccurate but also indicative of a potentially biased motive. I interpret the General’s perspective not as advocating for a master-slave relationship akin to that of the TPLF and ANDM, but rather as a pragmatic assessment. His aim seems to be focused on strategic maneuvers—a tactical or strategic alliance formed to weaken the enemy while bolstering one’s own strength, to reduce the enemy’s power and increase allies, a common practice in warfare.
Fano’s existential struggle necessitates a thorough evaluation of potential allies across Ethiopia, including the TPLF, for the creation of tactical and strategic alliances. The TPLF does not automatically denote an alliance; the decision rests solely with Fano leaders. This decision, however, requires a unified Fano leadership structure before such alliances can be considered, carefully weighing the “when,” “with whom,” and “how.” Past experiences will undoubtedly inform their choices, ensuring any alliance or collaboration is principled and strategic.
Without an official statement from Fano leadership, commenting solely on General Tefera Mamo’s perspective is precarious. Regarding the often-discussed “discrepancy” surrounding the TPLF’s relationship with various Fano factions, my current assessment is limited to this analysis.
Editor’s Note : Views in the article do not necessarily reflect the views of borkena.com
__
Subscribe: https://borkena.com/subscribe-borkena/
Join our Telegram Channel : t.me/borkena
Like borkena on Facebook
Add your business to Ethiopian Business Listing / Ethiopian Business Directory
Join the conversation. Follow us on X (Formerly Twitter) @zborkena to get the latest Ethiopian News updates regularly. Subscribe to YouTube channel To share information or for submission, send e-mail to info@borkena.com