
Mohamud A. Ahmed – Cagaweyne
Somali Region of Ethiopia
On August 7th last year, I wrote an article, published via Borkena, titled Did Dr. Abiy Ahmed Misunderstand the Nation or Did the Nation Misunderstand Him? In that piece, I argued, and still firmly believe, that it is the nation that misunderstood him. Today, as I return with this follow-up reflection, I do so on a day when he stands in Godey alongside Africa’s top billionaire to launch a fertilizer plant of continental significance. This moment, symbolic of both vision and controversy, provides a fitting backdrop for revisiting the paradox of a leader who remains profoundly misunderstood, admired by some, maligned by others, yet never irrelevant to the destiny of Ethiopia. I kindly ask my readers to bear with me, as this piece is somewhat longer than usual, but its length is necessitated by the depth of the subject.
History rarely offers a leader both the crown of vision and the space to implement it. Some are remembered as heroes because their enemies underestimated them. Others are remembered as villains because their admirers misunderstood them. Dr. Abiy Ahmed, Ethiopia’s Prime Minister, belongs to a rarer category altogether: the misunderstood reformer, the man who inspired his nation to believe in the mathematics of unity yet was denied the arithmetic of time and trust.
His ascent to power in 2018 felt like a cosmic tremor. Political prisoners walked free. Newspapers that had been muzzled were unshackled. Exiles returned to their homeland. And at the heart of it all was a young leader who dared to preach Medemer, the audacious idea that Ethiopia could escape its zero-sum politics by multiplying hope and subtracting grievance. The Nobel Peace Prize, awarded within his first year, was not merely recognition. It was an international coronation. Ethiopia, one of Africa’s most storied civilizations, appeared poised to vault into the club of continental anchors.
Yet history is unforgiving. Noble beginnings are not immune to brutal endings. Within a short span, Abiy’s Ethiopia became engulfed in wars that shredded both the image and substance of his early promises. For many, this was evidence that the man was never the visionary he claimed to be. For others, it proved that Ethiopia’s contradictions are too deep for any mortal to resolve. Both judgments may be too simplistic. The truth is paradoxical: Abiy Ahmed had noble ideas that could have propelled Ethiopia to the top of the continent, if not the world stage, but political envy, entrenched sabotage, and misjudged execution dragged him into the abyss.
The Burden of Noble Ideas
Ethiopia in 2018 was a tinderbox of grievances. The ethnic federal arrangement, designed after 1991, institutionalized differences rather than healing them. It gave communities autonomy but also licensed suspicion. By the time Dr. Abiy inherited power, the Ethiopian state resembled a mathematical puzzle with too many variables: ethnic memory, resource distribution, generational anger, and foreign meddling. His idea of Medemer was an attempt to create a new political calculus where addition replaced subtraction.
It was, in truth, a noble experiment. He believed that Ethiopians could transcend their labels without erasing them, that they could be simultaneously Oromo and Ethiopian, Somali and Ethiopian, Amhara and Ethiopian. In the language of mathematics, he sought to prove that diversity could be an equation of synergy rather than division.
But in politics, noble ideas are rarely accepted without resistance. The entrenched elites, the self-appointed custodians of power, saw in him not a partner but a threat. They were unwilling to lose their monopolies of narrative and influence. Their envy was not hidden. Their contempt was open. They did not simply disagree with him. They orchestrated sabotage from the very start.
Herein lies the first logical fallacy committed by many of Dr. Abiy’s critics: the fallacy of attribution. They attributed every failure of Ethiopia’s centuries-old contradictions to the shoulders of one man, ignoring the reality that he inherited not a clean slate but a poisoned chalice.
The Wolves of Power
The Ethiopian political arena is not a garden of roses. It is a forest where wolves hunt with patience and ferocity. Abiy stepped into this arena with a disarming smile, a preacher’s tone, and a reformer’s zeal. His adversaries, however, came armed with decades of networks, militias, propaganda machines, and foreign patrons.
They wanted to consume him, not merely challenge him. In their eyes, his youth was a weakness, his boldness a threat, and his vision a betrayal of their carefully guarded privileges. Some mocked his philosophy as poetry unfit for politics. Others dismissed his peace with Eritrea as theatrics. Yet many of those same voices had themselves failed to deliver peace or reform. This is where another logical fallacy emerges, the fallacy of double standards. Dr. Abiy’s initiatives were scrutinized under harsher lenses than those of his predecessors, not because they were inherently flawed but because envy magnified their imperfections.
The Wars of Inevitability
War is the oldest language of Ethiopian politics. The empire itself was built and defended through war. By the time Abiy assumed office, conflict was less a possibility than a certainty. His tragedy was not that wars happened, but that they were executed poorly, prolonged unnecessarily, and politically weaponized against him.
The Tigray war was catastrophic, both in humanitarian and reputational terms. It drained Ethiopia’s treasury, alienated international partners, and fractured the very unity Abiy preached. Critics quickly framed it as evidence of his incompetence. Yet here, again, nuance is required. War was inevitable. The challenge lay in its management. His failure was not in preventing war, which no one could have prevented under the circumstances, but in misjudging its execution and underestimating the global consequences.
One could invoke a simple mathematical reasoning. A war, like a loan, compounds interest the longer it drags on. What begins as a short-term cost quickly multiplies into an unbearable debt. Abiy underestimated this compounding effect.
The Missed Global Moment
Perhaps the most heartbreaking dimension of Dr. Abiy Ahmed’s tenure is the global moment Ethiopia missed. At the dawn of his leadership, Ethiopia was the darling of development economists and diplomats alike. Double-digit growth rates, the promise of the Grand Renaissance Dam, and a youthful population made the nation a candidate to join South Africa, Nigeria, and Egypt as Africa’s fourth anchor state. Addis Ababa already served as the continent’s diplomatic capital. Abiy could have transformed it into an economic and moral capital as well.
Consider the scale of the vision. The Trump administration had announced a ten-billion-dollar commitment for an airport project that, if completed, would be the largest in Africa. Today in Gode, two major projects have been launched alongside two others in the surrounding area, a combined ten billion dollars more. A nuclear plant and other planned ventures push Ethiopia’s pipeline of mega projects to well over thirty billion dollars. These are not marginal undertakings but continental-scale investments that could have rewritten Ethiopia’s economic map.
Instead, war consumed years that should have been dedicated to reform, investment, and integration. The Nobel laureate who once symbolized peace became the leader whose name was tied to headlines of severe droughts, atrocities, and insurgency. Yet even here, the narrative of total failure risks falling into the fallacy of hindsight bias. It assumes that Ethiopia’s rise was inevitable and only Dr. Abiy’s errors prevented it. In truth, Ethiopia’s path was always precarious, and even the most skilled leader would have stumbled against the inertia of history.
Suppose one carefully surveys the mega projects he has executed or is in the process of implementing, alongside the raging conflicts in Oromia, Amhara, and the isolated Tigray Region. In that case, one cannot help but wonder what Ethiopia might have looked like had war not devoured its potential. This is not to sound like a soothsayer in bullish defense of Abiy or a naysayer dismissing his opponents, but to pose a sober reflection: would Ethiopia have already joined the ranks of Africa’s top nations had peace been preserved? The irony is that his greatest achievements and his deepest failures coexist like parallel equations, one showing promise, the other exposing peril.
Misunderstood Nobility
To reduce Dr. Abiy Ahmed to a reckless dreamer is to erase the nobility of his vision. He spoke of dignity, of technological leapfrogging, of green legacies, of Ethiopia as not merely a country but an idea. His speeches resonated because they touched a deep reservoir of national pride. His reforms, though imperfect, cracked open doors long bolted shut.
His misunderstood essence lies in the fact that he wanted Ethiopia to ascend beyond its petty quarrels, but he underestimated how deeply those quarrels had become part of the nation’s political DNA. He tried to build a cathedral of unity while saboteurs dug tunnels beneath its foundation. He offered multiplication where rivals demanded subtraction.
Here, one cannot ignore his books. Medemer, Generation Medemer, and Medemer Journey form a trilogy of political philosophy, personal testimony, and visionary blueprint. They were not dry policy manuals but works of intellectual ambition, written in the cadence of a preacher and the style of a reformer. For his admirers, the books are Ethiopia’s guide to reconciliation and modernization. For his critics, they are lofty abstractions divorced from the realities of governance. Yet they reveal a man wrestling with ideas bigger than himself, a leader who wanted to transform politics into a moral and intellectual project. If his governance faltered, his writings still stand as testimony that he was not merely a tactician of survival but a thinker who dreamed of transcendence.
The Continent’s Mirror
Dr. Abiy Ahmed is not merely Ethiopia’s paradox. He is Africa’s mirror. Across the continent, leaders oscillate between liberators and autocrats, visionaries and villains. Abiy embodies both extremes simultaneously. He is adored abroad yet maligned at home, hailed as a reformer yet blamed as a warmonger, celebrated as a peacemaker yet scarred as a warrior. His misunderstood nobility is that he genuinely believed Ethiopia could leap beyond history, but he faced a nation that dragged him back into its trenches.
As one political philosopher once wrote, some men are crucified not for their sins but for their dreams. Abiy may well be such a man. His crucifixion lies not only in his missteps but in the envy, contempt, and sabotage of those who never wanted him to succeed.
Conclusion: The Unfinished Equation
Dr. Abiy Ahmed’s legacy remains unfinished. He will be remembered as the leader who almost made Ethiopia great, who painted a horizon too vast for his contemporaries to walk toward. His noble ideas were real, his mistakes undeniable, his adversaries merciless, and his people unprepared.
The final paradox is this. He may be Ethiopia’s misunderstood reformer, not because he failed to dream but because Ethiopia failed to allow him to succeed. The tragedy is not only his but the nation’s. It is a missed chance to join the top ranks of global players, a squandered opportunity to turn noble ideas into continental destiny.
As Ethiopia wrestles with its future, Dr. Abiy’s misunderstood story will linger like an unfinished equation, reminding us that in politics, as in mathematics, a single miscalculation can transform addition into subtraction, and synergy into silence.
Mohamud A. Ahmed is a Columnist, Political Analyst and Researcher at Greenlight Advisors Group, Somali Region of Ethiopia. He can be reached at : +251 900 644 648
Editor’s Note : Views in the article do not necessarily reflect the views of borkena.com
__
Support Borkena : https://borkena.com/subscribe-borkena/
Join our Telegram Channel : t.me/borkena
Like borkena on Facebook
To submit Press Release, send submission to info@borkena.com
Add your business to Ethiopian Business Listing / Ethiopian Business Directory
Join the conversation. Follow us on X (Formerly Twitter) @zborkena to get the latest Ethiopian News updates regularly.
I haven’t read your article yet, but here is my response to Getahun’s “Our Pain-Their Pleasure…”:
I support Abiy ≈80%. In my life time, Abiy’s Party is the first ever elected under on-site scrutiny by AU/UN/EU/US/etc. The over 100 opposition parties demanded an on-site poll station scrutiny by Westerners. It is Abiy & Co. who added AU since Ethiopia is a Black African Nation.
So, why weren’t irregularities reported on-site? It’s a no-brainer that armed insurrection against an elected government is Domestic Terrorism and should be dealt a Mortal Blow.
Cf.: Some former regimes chose to watch ≈200K citizens starve than airdrop 100g [10¢] bread. Under Abiy, >10 million students/kindergartners/nursery babies get ≥2 free meals.
Abiy is a Nobel Prize millionaire who could have lived a luxurious life anywhere. He chose to lead a Troubled & Turbulent Ethiopia plagued with millions of problems. Well, here are a few of the things that I appreciate about Abiy’s government:
1). Ref: The Ethiopia Abiy took over [59% GDP Debt]: [ youtu.be/upKEL9wQvrY?t=1200 ]
2). (i). IMF [8% Growth]: [ youtu.be/SJBVcbtzS3A ]
(ii). UNWFP [10% Growth]: [ youtu.be/MFHaKycK4P0?t=27 ]
3). Aliko Dangoté: “Africans are Proud of You!” [ youtu.be/QAAWPrulVIE ]
4). Abiy in 2017: [ youtu.be/r-oPVbKTRpM?t=1 ]
5). Ethiopia in the eyes of African Broadcasters: [ youtu.be/K26Yc45TtPc?t=2 ]
6). Abiy as TPLF’s Prisoner PM from Day-1: [ youtu.be/Pg3WuF1eXww?t=5 ]
The Somalis I have encountered during my travels and brief stay there are proud individuals who are not hesitant to express their opinions, rectify misunderstandings, and condemn evil people like Abiy Ahmed. Among them, I have not come across anyone like Mohamud A. Ahmed, who applauds Abiy despite the hardships faced by ordinary Amharas who work hard in farming and small businesses in urban areas, individuals who are not politically aligned. I trust that Somali elites have a different viewpoint from Mohamud A. Ahmed, who should be held accountable for minimizing the plight of the Amhara community and praising Abiy Ahmed.
Dear Brother Mohamud A. Ahmed
I have been reading the articles you posted on this esteemed website and I found them to be insightful and intuitive. Please continue gracing us with your independent and useful opinion about what you see being on the spot inside that gem of the colored. Please do not pay attention tn detractors who mumble and jumble from their comfy homes thousands of miles away from the action it all. These are not just critic but run-of-the-mill and beyond-repair bigots. For them there are people who can think and people who can’t. Keep plugging away, brother!!!
Blessings to you and your family.
What makes you believe that Abiy Ahmed is Ethiopia’s misunderstood reformer ?
Ethiopia under Meles Zenawi and Abiy Ahmed is the same. Abiy Ahmed is the continuation of Meles Zenawi. Meles Zenawi represents the tigrian minority, Abiy Ahmed represents the Oromo majority. The EPRDF – Prosperity Party’s ethnocentric constitution is responsible for the destruction of people’s unity, and the fragmentation of Ethiopia. The nation state Ethiopia is destroyed and reduced to a clan based ethnic state governance system by the constitution.
You mentioned about Abiy’s nobility without providing explanations. You raised the issue of Abiy’s relevancy without clarification. While Abiy’s medemer book is a simple but expanded story book, you called it a trilogy of political philosophy, personal testimony, and visionary blueprint. You called medemer a synergy, when medemer is simply a political language used as a propaganda tool.
Your fruitless attempt to allegorically condemn the people of Amhara speaks about your direct ties with the EPRDF – Prosperity Party ethnocentric playbook.
The only institution that united ethiopians was the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahdo Church. Abiy Ahmed, while preaching about people’s unity and national sovereignty, assaulted the only institution (Orthodox Tewahdo Church) that united ethiopians and defended Ethiopia’s sovereignty for centuries.
Your writing skill is excellent. Your narration so far is biased. Your readers would like to know about Islamic Terrorism and the future of Islam in the East and Horn of Africa.