Yoas Biru, PhD
The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) grants landlocked countries like Ethiopia rights to transit through neighboring states for commercial purposes, but no entitlement to sovereign coastal territory. Ethiopia’s Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed is not claiming Assab as Ethiopia’s sovereign land. Instead, he argues that Assab belongs to Eritrea, but Ethiopia—with over 120 million people—needs a coastline, as the current status quo is politically and economically unsustainable.
Abiy has been steadily raising the temperature. One day, he states Ethiopia will not wage war to capture Assab. The next day, he escalates rhetoric, saying it’s “a matter of time” before Ethiopia “regains” Assab, implying historical ownership to the pre-1993 era. This aligns with statements from Ethiopia’s Field Marshal Berhanu Jula: “While we quarreled among ourselves, we surrendered our access to the sea” and “It is only a matter of time before we become a member of the Red Sea community.”
From the Ethiopian government’s perspective, sea access is existential for economic growth, given reliance on Djibouti for 95% of trade and annual fees of ~$1.5-2 billion. Eritrea, however, views Assab as non-negotiable sovereign territory and has warned of retaliation against any aggression.
Abiy maintains Ethiopia seeks negotiations with Eritrea for sovereign Red Sea access. There is precedent: In 2013, landlocked Bolivia sued Chile at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to compel negotiations for Pacific access. In 2018, the ICJ ruled against Bolivia, stating Chile had no obligation to negotiate. This effectively closes the legal path for Ethiopia.
In theory, three options exist for sovereign access:
- Forceful annexation (e.g., Russia’s seizure of Crimea).
- Purchase of territory (e.g., Alaska from Russia to the U.S.).
- Land swaps (e.g., Austria–Italy in 1919, Poland–Soviet Union in 1951).
The Crimea Strategy Is Not Viable
Ethiopia lacks the capacity to seize and hold Assab by force. The government is engaged in conflicts with Fano militias in Amhara and the Oromo Liberation Army (OLA, aka Shene) in Oromia. Abiy’s bravado to bring Fano to its knees in two months has proven to be a hollow rhetoric. Morale in the Ethiopian National Defense Forces (ENDF) is low, with widespread desertions. Key reports include:
- The U.S. State Department’s 2024 Human Rights Report (released August 2025) estimates 10,000-15,000 desertions annually in conflict zones, based on Ethiopian Human Rights Commission (EHRC) data.
- Human Rights Watch’s 2025 World Report notes low morale and troop strains, with up to 30% desertions in specific units during 2024-2025 offensives, derived from aggregated EHRC and ACLED data.
- EHRC’s Quarterly Report (September-December 2024, released January 2025) documents over 150 desertions in Oromia’s East Wollega due to mutinies over civilian targeting orders.
- Amnesty International’s January 2025 briefing reports sporadic morale collapses in Arsi Zone amid OLA ambushes.
- Reuters reported at least 2,000 former Amhara regional troops defecting to Fano in October 2023, citing post-Tigray War betrayals.
Neither Fano nor Shene—the government’s most formidable foes—would suddenly unite behind Abiy to fight Eritrea. They know betrayal is his trademark. Ask Lemma Megersa, Isaias Afwerki, or Gedu Andargachew what happened once Abiy no longer needed them.
Beyond military weakness, seizing sovereign land violates international law and the African Union’s Charter (Article 4) on territorial integrity, risking Ethiopia’s AU hosting status. Russia’s annexation of Crimea offers another cautionary tale: crippling sanctions, near-total diplomatic isolation, and long-term economic pain. Ethiopia, already facing currency collapse and food insecurity, would not survive such punishment.
The Alaska Strategy Is Not an Option
Ethiopia lacks resources to purchase a port. A just-released IMF and World Bank report flags that Ethiopia’s debt structure is “unsustainable” and the country is under “debt distress.” As the result, government spending on key sectors has been declining since the 2020 Tigray War. Four indicators highlight this:
Education: ~4% of GDP in 2021-2022, projected at ~3-4% for 2025—below UNESCO’s 4-6% benchmark.
Health: ~3% of GDP in 2021-2022, projected at ~2.5-3% for 2025—far below the Abuja Declaration’s 15% of budget target (Ethiopia’s ~7-8%).
Gross Fixed Capital Formation (including buildings, machinery, transport, and agricultural assets): ~31% of GDP in 2020, down to 20.5% in 2024, with a similar trend projected for 2025—below the 25-30% aspirational for developing countries.
Social Protection (pro-poor programs): ~1.6% of GDP in 2020-2022, rising to ~2.8% projected for 2025—still below the 3-5% consensus minimum (excluding health).
These low figures reflect fiscal strains from debt and conflict. Even with resources, Eritrea is unwilling to sell, and diplomacy has faltered post-2022 Tigray peace.
Abiy’s suggestion of offering Eritrea a share of Ethiopian Airlines profits is economic nonsense. The airline makes less than $1 billion in annual profit; even a 30% share is a paltry $300 million—compared to the billions Eritrea can expect from simple port service fees without ceding sovereignty suggests the offer was not serious. In any case, Eritrea has made clear it is not selling.
Land Swap Seems the Only Viable Option, Though Politically Fraught
Assab holds limited value for Eritrea. A swap involving disputed areas like Welkait (plus parts of Gondar or Tigray) could boost Eritrea’s agriculture and foreign exchange. However, this risks sparking internal resistance in Ethiopia’s Amhara and Tigray regions due to ethnic claims, and Eritrea may reject it outright as a sovereignty violation.
Geopolitical Factors Weigh Against Ethiopia
As the PM escalates nationalistic rhetoric, Eritrea’s President Isaias Afwerki builds alliances, including a multi-billion-dollar deal with Saudi Arabia to modernize Assab under Vision 2030—diversifying logistics and countering rivals like the UAE, Turkey, and China. Saudi’s $600 billion US investment over four years and ~$27.5 billion FDI stock in the UK (plus $5 billion recent deals and $39 billion raised via the London Stock Exchange in 2025) provide leverage for international pressure. Recent US/UK-Ethiopian meetings have warned against miscalculations in the Red Sea quest.
The Politics of Distraction
Even assuming legitimacy in pursuing access to sea by any means necessary (including war), requires national unity, military readiness, economic strength for sustained conflict, and diplomatic wins. Currently, support for Assab rhetoric is largely among government allies, while Ethiopians remain war-weary. The ENDF is stretched across fronts, with untrained, unmotivated troops—some reportedly fleeing battles leaving their weapons behind, prompting the government to ration ammo to minimize weapon confiscation by enemy forces. The economy faces debilitating inflation and birr devaluation, raising import costs for weapons and other goods.
So, what explains Abiy’s posturing at this juncture? Stripped away the bluster, Abiy’s campaign is about survival. He faces collapsing law and order, wars in Amhara and Oromia, a broken economy, a spiraling exchange rate, and an exhausted, fragmented army. Whipping up nationalist fervor over Assab is a cynical diversion—a bid to buy time, not to secure Ethiopia’s future.
The tragedy is that Ethiopians, weary from endless wars, are being baited into another quagmire. Chasing fantasies of sovereign access to the Red Sea will bring neither prosperity nor peace. It will accelerate Ethiopia’s isolation, deepen its poverty, and further fracture its social fabric.
Ethiopians must see this for what it is. It is not a greater national cause but a rather cheap political survival tactic. Following Abiy down this path will harm the nation far more than it could ever help.
Editor’s Note : Views in the article do not necessarily reflect the views of borkena.com
__
Support Borkena : https://borkena.com/subscribe-borkena/
Join our Telegram Channel : t.me/borkena
Like borkena on Facebook
To submit Press Release, send submission to info@borkena.com
Add your business to Ethiopian Business Listing / Ethiopian Business Directory
Join the conversation. Follow us on X (Formerly Twitter) @zborkena to get the latest Ethiopian News updates regularly.
Ethiopia has a legitimate right to claim access to the port of Assab, based on historical ties and the of Afar coastal inhabitants . The Afar who are culturally and religiously distinct from highland Tigrinya-speaking groups of particularly “Hamasene” nationality. The Afar people deserve the opportunity to express their will through a referendum. Ethiopia should strategically buy time until the end of Isaias Afweki’s called by Mother nature. A significant portion of Ethiopians’s urban population has rallied behind Abey Ahmed Red Sea claims rhetoric . That should be considered.as popular voice to be heard .
Had it been for your incessant myopic intellectual dishonesty and Doomsday Data Cherry-Picking, Ethiopia should have fallen in to ‘Perpetual Economic Coma’ years ago.
During the TPLF-EPRDF reign, most institutions you quoted were telling the world: “Ethiopia has been registering double-digit economic growth for over 2 decades…The fastest growing economy in Sub-Saharan Africa …”
Alas, just weeks after TPLF retreated to Tigray, the same institutions said: “Ethiopia’s economy is in shambles & in downward spiral.” You & your peers take us for amnesiacs?
All the while, TPLF & Co. looted billions; Ethiopia incurred a 59% GDP debt; and even left no money for government employees’ salary → [ youtu.be/upKEL9wQvrY?t=1200 ].
Anyway, when it comes to your Ethiopia/Eritrea/Aseb issue analysis, I am going to repost [below] the comment I posted under “The Red Sea Chessboard…” by Surafel G.
1). No Quid Pro Quo for Aseb/Affar: Affar/Aseb has never been part of Eritrea let alone “Eritrea’s Sovereign Territory.” Would you reward Mercenary Bandits for robbing you?
2). Affar [Massawa to Djibouti Red Sea Coast]: Affar is Ethiopia’s Affars’ ancestral land with Asèb & Sèmèrä as alternate capitals. Hence, Affar is Ethiopia’s Land & Sea Coast. It was annexed by Eritrea when EPLF & TPLF invaded-and-occupied Ethiopia in 1991.
3). Alsace-Lorraine [France] vs. Eritrea [Ethiopia]: Germany occupied France’s Alsace-Lorraine twice and returned it twice [≈1918 & ≈1945]. Eritrea was Ethiopia’s land taken by Italy during the First Italo-Ethiopian War (≈1896) and occupied till ≈1945.
When WW-II ended [≈1945], the Italian Command in Eritrea surrendered to the British [Allies] and handed Eritrea over to the British. Why didn’t the British return Eritrea to Ethiopia as the Allied Command in Europe returned Alsace-Lorraine to France?
4). Eritrea & Peace: That’s Oxymoron! No sooner had Eritrea declared its ‘independence’ than invaded Sudan, Ethiopia, Djibouti, and Yemen [Hanish Islands]. Egypt’s mission for Eritrea’s EPLF/ELF/etc. is to destabilize Ethiopia directly or via proxies, NOT PEACE!
5). Business with Eritrea: How many bitter lessons do we want Eritrea to teach Ethiopia? In 1998, Eritrea took millions of dollars worth of import-export merchandise at Aseb & Massawa. Just recently, Ethiopian Airlines was robbed of millions in cash and property.
6). Abiy & His Motives: To me, Abiy is an Ethiopian Patriot trying to make a difference in Ethiopians’ lives. He is a Nobel Prize millionaire who has had better options than leading Troubled & Turbulent Ethiopia. He is an Ethiopian Patriot to be proud of.
Abiy Ahmed is bluffing and some are giving unnecessary attention to his bluff. His Amhara fooling tactic should not be an issue as it is not working. His army is in disarray and can not stand against the well trained and prepared forces of Eritrea. Abiy Ahmed is aware of this fact and will not start a war that will seal his fate.
”PM Abiy Is Dangerously Stoking Nationalistic Sentiment Over the Assab Port” Really SIR?
What was your expectation on this subject? Now It is clear that you undermine your readers otherwise how come you flag such unity to restore Ethiopia? what is the other way beside Nationalistic Sentiment to get back what was taken from us by force? I am amused and praying for you at the same time. You need help sir….
This is clearly AI generated content as verified by ( app.gptzero.me) and it’s analysis format. Please Yonas Biru ( PhD) as PhD holder you’re expected to produce original, rigorous work. Publishing AI-generated articles undermines academic integrity, erodes trust, and sets a poor example. It shows a lack of responsibility, originality, and ethical judgment.
This article is significant work and instrument of peace. Enough of this war talk. Ethiopians and Eritreans have suffered enough bloodshed, poverty, and betrayal from leaders who use “national pride” to cover their own failures. No one wins when brothers and sisters on both sides of the border are sent to die for political survival.
This endless obsession with Assab and the Red Sea is nothing but a distraction from the real issues: hunger, corruption, unemployment, and collapsing public services. While ordinary people struggle to survive, the government beats the drums of war to silence dissent and shift attention.
We need courage – not to fight – but to reject this madness. Ethiopia doesn’t need another war; it needs peace, justice, and leadership that values life over territory. The Horn of Africa should not be a graveyard of young dreams for the sake of political egos.
Let’s raise our voices against this reckless warmongering. Let’s demand dialogue, accountability, and regional cooperation. Our people deserve a future built on peace, not propaganda.