Thursday, June 30, 2022
HomeOpinionThe constitution that gave TPLF the Leeway for Pillaging Ethiopia

The constitution that gave TPLF the Leeway for Pillaging Ethiopia

 

By Sewale Belew

Lingering Tentacles of Article 39 

When TPLF managed to get what it called ‘Ethiopia’s Constitution ratified in its 1994 parliamentary assembly, it established Ethiopia as a tribally federated republic under its full  custody. This TPLF devised-constitution comprised the principle of self-determination through  what it called “democratic-centralism” ruling mechanism that befits well to its covert agenda of  making TPLF attain its goal of governing Ethiopia or breaking the country apart and then  seceding Tigray as an independent state. 

Allegedly, to further its ultimate divisive ends and that of pillaging Ethiopia covertly and overtly,  the TPLF injected its own Deddebit made constitution that granted, what it calls: all “Nations,  Nationalities, and Peoples” in Ethiopia the absolute right to secede from the nation. To Ethiopian  minorities and observers in the global community, Ethiopia seemed self-assured for democratic  reform that would end decades of oppression. However, soon after the new Constitution was  endorsed, some legal scholars criticized its provision that allows regions within Ethiopia to secede. According to several of these scholars, the provision, pronounced in Article 39, creates  an unworkable form of central government by making it too easy for the country to break apart. 

Needless to say, as per Article 39, all that a region needs to exercise its right of secession is a  referendum passed by a two-thirds majority of its regional parliament and a separate  referendum passed by a simple majority of the national parliament. Most of the scholars who  have criticized Article 39 assume that its inclusion in the 1994 Constitution was realized as a give  and take between TPLF itself and its surrogate tribal groups put jointly under the label – EPRDF regional representatives. Under this assumption, the EPRDF reluctantly included Article 39 in the  Constitution in order to appease regional calls for self-determination rights by minority  populations who were inspired by the secession of 1993, mainly hard-pushed by TPLF. In other  words, the EPRDF needed to include Article 39 in order to gather ratification support from TPLF  mandated regional governments to which the silent voiceless majority of Ethiopians remained  spectators of the overall show. 

Ever since the ratification of Article 39, which TPLF thought was shoving its knife on the heart of  Ethiopia’s national unity, political unrests that persistently took place over and time again  demonstrated that this TPLF’s divisive notion is incorrect and futile. No matter what the silent  majority Ethiopians ponder about Ethiopia’s sovereignty and national integrity, in due course of  time, a new illuminating and explosive theory regarding TPLF’s purpose behind Article 39 under  its EPRDF-mantle is quietly gaining acceptance in Ethiopian and among international circles.  TPLF’s purpose behind Article 39 has all the hallmarks of a grand conspiracy devised to intentionally implicate what it called as the Federal government established under democratic  centralism; and this centralism is the highest levels of the Ethiopian federal government. According to TPLF and EPRDF remarks, it involves a far-reaching plan with long-term goals; and  it involves the use of violence and under-handed politics in order to perpetrate a fraud on the Ethiopian people and the international community. In brief, the new TPLF devised theory is this:  the TPLF-dominated EPRDF intentionally included Article 39 in Ethiopia’s 1994 Constitution so  that the Tigray region could loot Ethiopia of its resources, use the Ethiopian military to expand  the borders of Tigray to having its own seaport, and then secede from Ethiopia, when the time is  ripe enough and strategically accommodating to realize this goal. Underlying this theory is the  widely held opinion that the TPLF and EPRDF are not independent organizations, but symbiotic. 

The evidence supporting this theory comes from several sources. Most importantly, the TPLF  leadership had already put its intentions in writing in TPLF’s manifesto known as the “Republic of  Greater Tigrai..” Drafted in 1976, the manifesto outlines an intricate plan for the liberation of  Tigray from what it calls “Ethiopian rule”. The plan involves two main steps: (a) re-demarcating  Tigray’s borders in all frontiers and to expand the Tigray region’s borders within Ethiopia, and (b)  obtaining coastal lands from Eritrea and ultimately seceding as an independent nation of Tigray. 

In a similar tone, TPLF and its back-up political organizations put under the umbrella of EPRDF  have jointly taken several actions that seem to adhere to the plans set forth in the TPLF  manifesto since it took over Ethiopia’s central government in 1991. For example, the TPLF/EPRDF  have jointly and dramatically developed the Tigray region since they came to power. Before the  1991 Revolution, Tigray was territorially limited and economically underdeveloped. Since the  Revolution, in addition to trying to acquire Badme from Eritrea (discussed below), Tigray has  successfully annexed vast fertile lands from the neighboring regions of Afar, Assossa,  Benishangul, Gondar, and Wollo within Ethiopia. In clandestine, to be disclosed in the long run,  it even included the site where the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) has been  constructed in in the Benishangul-Gumuz region into Greater Tigray so that it can make deals  with Egypt and Sudan in manners that befits TPLFs’ grand vision for Tigray.  

USA’s affiliation with TPLF  

Viewed from US never ending proxy war perpetuation perspectives, Herman Cohen was the US  Secretary of State during the reign of President George W. Bush (1989-1993). He played a key  role in TPLF’s crackdown on the Ethiopian people’s cultural cohesiveness and unity. He did so by  persuading the Ethiopian military commanders of the 980s to “immediately and unconditionally  cease fire” during the London talks and, conversely, urging the TPLF to use its full power to gain  control of Addis Ababa in 1990. Simultaneously, he made arrangements for Colonel Mengistu  Hailemariam to leave the country instantly, which the latter did as requested.  

Herman Cohen has always been a TPLF fanatic who recently disclosed in a tweet message the  main reason why the Bahir Dar massacre failed by stating :

” Failed coup in #Ethiopia’s Amhara state was an attempt by ethnic nationalists to restore  Amhara hegemony over all of Ethiopia that existed for several centuries prior to  1991. That dream is now permanently dead.” 

On January 6, 2022, The Chinese Foreign minister disclosed China’s plan to appoint a special  envoy to the Horn of Africa to help resolve conflicts in the region. According to the Chinese government vision, mission and making matters real, leaders of the Hoorn Africa nations should  consider convening a peace and security conference. This was affirmed by China’s Foreign  Affairs Minister Wang Yi at a briefing he made in Kenya’s port city of Mombasa. He continued  his Africa tour that started in Eritrea on Jan. 5, 2022 on to the Comoros. The visit follows the  Forum held earlier on the China-Africa Cooperation summit in Senegal in November and his visit in  Ethiopia in December 2021. These Wang’s comments come as the TPLF insurgency rages in  Amhara and Afar regions of Ethiopia and political protests persist in Sudan and Somalia; events  that have battered the Horn Africa nations’ economies. China, which is among the biggest  financial lenders in Africa, joins hands with other leaders from the continent and the Middle East  in trying to halt and resolve conflicts in the Horn. Wang visited Ethiopia in December to show  support for Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed’s government amid a yearlong war with TPLF-rebels. In  Kenya, China signed six bilateral agreements with the East African nation on issues including  health, poverty reduction and agricultural development, trade promotion and investments. 

To counter China’s recent aggressive moves in the Horn of Africa and its plant to appoint a  special envoy to the Horn of Africa to help resolve conflicts in the region, the U.S. on its part  made a sudden move to appointed Ambassador David Satterfield to replace Jeffrey Feltman as  special envoy for the Horn of Africa., to handle matters pertinent to (a) the ongoing civil war  instigated by TPLF, (b) the dispute over the construction of a mega-dam on the Nile River, and  (c) the political and social upheaval in neighboring Sudan and Somalia.  

Feltman traveled to Ethiopia on Thursday, January 6, 2022 and met with Prime Minister Abiy  Ahmed in what will be his last trip as special envoy. He was working alongside the African Union  negotiator Olusegun Obasanjo and other mediators to end the conflict between PM Abiy’s  federal forces and TPLF-dissidents. In less than 24 hours after the meeting, Satterfield’s  appointment came as a counteraction to the Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi’s visit in Kenya  and his announcement that China plans to appoint its own special envoy to the Horn of Africa. 

PM Abiy’s Sudden Surrender to Western Allies Arms-Twisting Pressures  

Less than 24 hours after the meeting held with Jeffrey Feltman, PM Abiy had to make a quick  and instant decision on January 7, 2022 in order to facilitate his upcoming direct discussion with  President Joe Biden by fulfilling primarily set conditions that could possibly be able to appease  the Biden administration’s ongoing arms-twisting pressures aired out in Addis Ababa via  Feltman. Admittedly the PM himself was shocked when he was told these bitter-pill-like  preconditions initially. And without having any choice and not to miss the chance to directly  confront President Biden and tell him Ethiopia’s regime side of the situation his government 

faces TPLF instigators. The sudden “amnesty” decisions he made were not as such judicially  concluded legal pardon, but amnesty out of sheer concern for aged people’s health conditions  who cannot escape facing judgment whenever required by the judicious court order in future.  His surrender to the arms-twisting deals provoked by the Western powers was inescapable viewed from the country’s current grave and troubling situations deliberately and enviously instigated by TPLF mercenary fighters and their Trojan horse OLF-Shenne bandits. Putting aside emotional anger and heartbreaking feelings we all suffered from in recent days, realistically  speaking, with all the suffering of the Ethiopian people yet to resolve, Ethiopia cannot afford to  fight against well-armed and highly experienced Western neocolonialists, but to buy time  through diplomatically smart decisions until Ethiopia recovers from the heavy societal poor  conditions created by recent havocs of all kinds. 

As President Issayas Afeworki has correctly and unflinchingly told the truth in recent days, the  war with TPLF instigators is not yet over. To date, TPLF is flexing its muscles in all directions of  Tigray and has already invaded once again those freed parts of Waja, Kobo, Alamata, Waldiba  and Mai Tsemri in the Amhara region and continuing its push towards Humeraa and Tsegede  localities. It is even threatening to further invade Gondar and to take over the corridor of  Armachuho and Tsegede along the Tekeze River side. 

Amidst such conditions, PM Abiy had no choice but to ascertain his obedience to the US and  NATO Allies, who are mainly interested to counter China, Russia and Turkey and stop the  Chinese aggressive move to gain easy access to the region. Cognizant about the fact that the US  and it NATO allies have been putting the long-suspected arms-twisting pressures upon him, just  to appraise in favor of TPLF that has been a longtime ally of the West, PM Abiy, on his part, had  to come up with quick answers that fulfill immediate primary conditions demanded by the West.  Instantly, PM Abiy was sending more positive signals including the release of prisoners and his  openness to carry on the dialogue with opposition parties and those warring factions in  Ethiopia. To him, these actions could somehow repeal the jeopardy challenges surrounding the  mere existence and functioning of his own administration. Hence, in less than 48 hours after  Feltman left Addis Ababa, President Biden commended PM Abiy on his recent release of key political prisoners. The two leaders further emphasized the importance of the U.S.-Ethiopia  relationships, the potential to strengthen cooperation on a range of issues pertaining to  Ethiopia, and the need for concrete progress to resolve the conflict through accelerated dialogue toward a negotiated ceasefire, the urgency of improving humanitarian access across  all troubled areas within Ethiopia, and the need to address the human rights concerns. 

By doing so, PM Abiy appears to be offering an olive branch to end more than a year of conflict  instigated by TPLF in the Afar, Amhara and Tigray regions. Certainly, to this effect, in a tweet, PM  Abiy described his conversation with President Biden as “candid” and said the two had discussed strengthening cooperation that may likely iron-out the currently existing defaults in these  regions.

TPLF-leadership and their treasonous crimes have obviously cost Ethiopia and its  defense forces by numerous legs, limbs and lives for over half a century since the advent of their  struggle in Deddbit, Kola-Tembien. The continuing atrocities still being committed by TPLF and  its running dogs like OLF-Shenne are equally causing casualties and atrocities on innocent  civilian lives, infrastructures and national resources.  

Paving the Way for Brutal Atrocities  

Why is the instinct for TPLF leadership’s revenge so strong even when it is clear that widespread  death and destruction would be a much more likely outcome of such vengeance actions than  any kind of “victory”? TPLF’s thinking line of revenge and the hatred on which it rests makes it  entirely credible for TPLF and its followers to have the courage to advance its retaliation against  what it calls: “to deter the Amhara threat of future exploitation. For TPLF, revenge is more of an emotional situation that gets activated routinely and provides a strong drive in Tigray people’s  mind, who feel they have been mistreated by the Amhara for generations. TPLF’s persistent  reason for retaliation against the Amhara is strong enough that, even when no benefit can  accrue from launching an initial assault, as it did on the Ethiopian Northern Defense Forces, it  will carry it out by all means even in future.  

TPLF’s such unusual, poisonous and exaggerated actions to achieve its goals are as follows: (1)  Our mission is based on the belief that the people of Tigray are the source of all political power.  (2) The blood, existence, and struggle of the Tigray community are based on the soil of Tigray.  (3) The loyalty of the people of Tigray to the TPLF and the government of Tigray is greater than  any structural loyalty. Therefore, the people of Tigray, as a community of Tigray, are connected  by blood, soul and, mentally, as one body. (4) To achieve our goal, the TPLF must take full  control of all aspects of life for the people of Tigray. (5) The people of Tigray must be prepared  and willing to accept that it is a constant struggle and, without hindrance, moving forward. (6)  Tigray itself, despite being considered a minority nation, has the absolute right to own and  maintain its own place of residence, the people of Tigray, who are dominated by its efforts for  success. (7) As determined citizens of Tigray, in our struggle for our rights, we must always be  strong and strive for the ultimate victory. We must also hope. (8) As a people of Tigray descent,  we are surrounded by enemies throughout our borders. (9) We will save our lives by relying on  the support of Western powers for any attempt at genocide against our people. (10) In the end,  the Tigray region will rise up in its own struggle and thrive on the bed of our past Ethiopia. 

The masses or the people of Tigray, especially the younger generation of Tigray who have been  born and brought up during the reign of TPLF, have been brainwashed and poisoned by the  TPLF. The TPLF has turned the people of Tigray into disobedience to Tigray’s traditional and  other religious and other social leaders. The TPLF has repeatedly fought to undermine the  consciousness of the Tigrayan people, creating a fear of genocide that could otherwise happen.  Introduce them to the concept of Greater Tigray by deliberately training young cadres who can  fill the confidence of the people. Eventually, the people of Tigray accepted the TPLF as the sole political leader and could lead to greater independence in Greater Tigray. This absolute loyalty  has led them to submit to the extremist political leadership of the TPLF. Since then, the TPLF has  been writing books about the “Greater Tigray” in its youthful mind, and it is certain that most of  the youth of Tigray will benefit from the TPLF’s policies and practices. They seem to believe in  this TPLF doctrine.  

TPLF has been in control of the country for the past 30 years. Especially the TPLF cadres, who are  closely monitored and trained by the TPLF cadres in Tigray, have been governing themselves  with the poisonous conscience of the TPLF, believing that the TPLF is the “image of God” to  liberate Tigray. A special benefit to them. At the same time, mothers have been blessed and  encouraged by their teenage children to buy whatever the TPLF wants. 

On the other hand, the people of Tigray are still facing a series of endless conflicts without  proper compensation. Their lives for the benefit of the ruling TPLF elite. The youth of Tigray have  been, and continue to be, subject to the ‘ruling TPLF political culture’ that has been broadcast in  Tigray, media, educational institutions, and other institutional shows in the region. This new  culture is intended to benefit the people of Tigray, with special rules, values and exclusions in  order to maintain TPLF dominance. Currently, for example, TPLF Diaspora cadres are alienating  families from Tigray, particularly individuals from the Amhara ethnic groups and peoples, and  isolating themselves from any social activity. 

To add fuel to an ongoing fire, TPLF’s continuously committed atrocities and similar attacks  waged by its running dogs like OLF-Shenne are causing casualties and death on innocent  civilians, devastating destruction on infrastructures and national resources. For over three  decades, those TPLF planted and mushroomed tribalism-led hate speech, racism, and  xenophobia have already escalated into a full-blown conflict causing killings of innocent lives  and evictions from places of inhabitance. With such TPLF instigated issues at the core, it is  difficult to solve any of the ethnic or tribalism problems without correcting the political and  historical narratives provided in the constitution itself and without attempting to halt the  resultant societal problems caused by tribalism. 

President Issayas Afeworki of Eritrea, President Kagame of Rwanda, President Musseveni of  Uganda, and many more societal critics, have persistently reminded PM Abiy and his  government to give priority to ironing out the tribally-led TPLF-EPRDF-constitution and to bring  Ethiopia to a stage of a harmonious, united, peaceful and stable country. But to our dismay, it  seems their sincere and righteous warnings and pleas have fallen on deaf ears thus far. For as  long as PM Abiy carries forward with the ongoing TPLF-EPRDF-tribal-led-constitution and  administrative agendas, he is simply carrying forward the tribal-led balances of the former TPLF EPRDF regime’s constitution, which will continue to keep Ethiopia in constant, unabated and  futile civil strives in future. 

TPLF’s Dream for Realizing Greater Tigray

TPLF’s thinking line of revenge and the hatred on which it rests makes it entirely credible for  TPLF and its followers to have the courage to advance its retaliation against what it calls: “to  deter the Amhara threat of future exploitation. To achieve its sinister objectives,  

So, TPLF has always been on its looting spree within Ethiopia since the mid-1970s. Throughout  these decades until the present, TPLF continues to misrepresent Tigray and Ethiopia’s known  history to the extent of claiming to have its roots in Yemen. It keeps on playing victim, and  manipulates information as it befits its own survival and triumphant objectives. TPLF and its  TPLF-hatched political sibling associations gathered under the “EPRDF umbrella” have  persistently perpetrated a grand fraud on the Ethiopian people and even on global humanitarian  and donor communities. As an entity, the TPLF / EPRDF/ has established a facade of democracy  in order to garner both internal support and international aid. Since 1991, the Tigray-dominated  central government has systematically undermined that democracy and diverted Ethiopia’s  resources into Tigray. In addition, the TPLF/EPRDF has created a Constitution that gives Tigray  the “unconditional right” to secede from Ethiopia based on the self-determination principle. In  pursuit of a “Greater Tigrai,” the TPLF has expanded the borders of Tigray and has continued to  attempt to gain its own regional access to the Red Sea. Recently, it was demanding the UN to  enable Tigray to gain the Port of Assab. 

It remains to be seen whether or not the TPLF would ever be able to realize these goals set forth  in the “Republic of Greater Tigrai.” Undoubtedly, TPLF’s plans were set back immensely by  Ethiopia’s failure to capture key territories in the Ethiopia-Eritrea border dispute. The decision  handed down by the Eritrea – Ethiopia Boundary Commission further hindered the TPLF.  

Ethiopians have tolerated TPLF’s 27 years of: (a) iron rules of ethnic chauvinism elevated as  national constitution and (b) blatant corruption and favoritism along ethnic lines. So, regardless  of whether or not Tigray ever actually tries to secede, Ethiopia’s recent history has presented the  following unique questions to the US and its NATO allies who persistently push proxy wars to  maintain their geopolitical and economic interests around the globe: What is the legitimate  significance of a constitutional right of secession? Must the US and its NATO allies respect such  a secession right when it is based in deception? What duty does the U.N. weakened by the  control of the US and its NATO allies have to intervene when a dominant minority population  organized under TPLF uses the concept of self-determination in order to oppress other  minorities? 

Let truth be told. The United States and its NATO allies jointly, have chosen to ignore these and  other critical questions regarding the sovereign state of Ethiopia. Their only burning concern has  been and still remains to be their vested interest of preserving TPLF as a renowned ally in the  “war on terror”; and not that much their concern about the legitimacy of Ethiopia’s internal  “democracy.” By blindly aiding the TPLF, the United States risks creating a populous in Ethiopia  rich with anti-American sentiment. The secession of Tigray would only provoke more anger and 

ultimately create the potential for more terror directed at American interests. The world cannot  afford to ignore the hidden agenda of the TPLF any longer.

The writer could be reached at  – sewaleb@yahoo.com 

__
To publish article on borkena, please send submission to info@borkena.com 

Join the conversation. Follow us on twitter @zborkenato get latest Ethiopian News updates regularly.Like borkena on Facebook as well. To share information or for submission, send e-mail to info@borkena.com

advertisment

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here