Wednesday, September 27, 2023
HomeEthiopian NewsOn Determinants of U.S. Foreign Policy in the Digital Age: Disinformation,...

On Determinants of U.S. Foreign Policy in the Digital Age: Disinformation, Money and Connections

Vision Ethiopia _ U.S. Foreign Policy

Vision Ethiopia Statement

On May 23, 2021, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, announced visa sanctions against  Ethiopian and Eritrean government officials and other individuals who are “… responsible for or  complicit in undermining the resolution of the crisis in Tigray.” The State Department press  statement also promulgated that the Biden administration has “imposed wide-ranging  restrictions on economic and security assistance to Ethiopia and will bring our defense trade  control policy in line with them.” 

The draconian measure swiftly taken by the Biden administration appears to mark a watershed  moment heralding a shift in the drivers of U.S. diplomacy. First, the measure, which typically is reserved for enemies of the U.S., is being targeted at a longtime ally in the fight against terrorism and violent extremism in the Horn of Africa. Secondly, the justification of the measures  with respect to human rights protection is patently fallacious and discriminatory, as the Biden  administration has deafeningly refused to break its silence about human rights abuses in other  parts of the country, including the raging genocidal atrocities being committed against Amharas,  Orthodox Christians and other minority groups who live in the Oromia and Benishangul-Giumuz  regions. In addition, the basis for the hastily taken measures is not thoroughly-researched  evidence, but instead dubious reports by journalists and social media activists with ostensibly  nefarious intentions. Lastly, and most importantly, the real motivation for the uncanny measure appears to be personal connections shrouded in a lofty humanitarian veil rather than the  advancement of a coherently framed foreign policy, as was the case in previous decades. 

During the Cold War, the U.S. foreign policy was anchored on ideological foundations, reflecting  the country’s commitment to uphold democracy and the sanctity of individual freedoms. Even in cases when there were idiosyncratic mishaps of external affairs, examples of which were in  abundance, it was often possible to find justification with reference to the overarching policy  objectives. The conflicts in Southeast Asia, the humanitarian tragedies in Central and South  America, and the rise and fall of dictatorships in various African and other developing countries, in which the U.S. played significant roles in one form or another, could all be explained as a  piece of the bigger puzzle, viz., the containment or abolishment of communism. When the  Soviet Union collapsed and policy Americana prevailed, very few pundits challenged how the end had justified the means. 

In the post-cold-war era, the US foreign policy was mostly driven by the fight against terrorism.  While this policy shared many remarkable features in common with the Soviet-era strategies, it  was markedly different in many other respects. One notable distinction is the absence of a rival  superpower — a factor that often complicated the formulation of a coherent policy and  

necessitated the need to reorient the focus toward an asymmetric warfare. On the other hand,  other strategies have continued to be essential elements of the new policy. These include  forging alliance with dictators that are perceived to be indispensable in the fight against terror. A  case in point is the support accorded to dictators such as Meles Zenawi of Ethiopia, a tyrant  who had managed to hold the West captive, notwithstanding his proven records of human rights  abuse, corruption and disastrous internal policies. 

If the current policy of the United States toward Ethiopia is a bellwether of what is to come, it is  a disconcerting shift from earlier strategies in a number of areas. At face value, it seems to be  one characterized by a propensity to be influenced by disinformation, embezzled money and  cronyism, rather than by a robust framework pivoted on time-honored Western values. In the  following, we highlight some examples of these features and outline the consequences of such  disastrous strategies to Ethiopia’s integrity in particular, and regional stability and world security  in general. In a more geopolitical perspective, we argue that this shift might portend the erosion  of America’s longstanding position in world stage as a bastion of freedom and democracy, and  the beginning of the end of its dominance in shaping international diplomacy and the new world  order. Most notably, we maintain that the implication of this for the emergence of new powers  such as China is consequential, since the vacuum irresponsibly created by U.S. policymakers is  likely to invite new players in some of these geopolitically lucrative regions. 

The Backdrop to the Conflict in the Tigray Region 

After the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF) was ejected from power through a popular  uprising in 2018, the leadership retreated to the Tigray region, and challenged the authority of  the central government, both covertly and overtly. However, the crescendo of the conflict was  the surprise attack, in the early hours of November 4, 2020, by the TPLF on the Northern Command of the Ethiopian National Defense Forces (ENDF) stationed in Tigray. As  acknowledged by the TPLF itself, the brazen attack was devastating to the ENDF, and, without  the swift counteroffensive by the government, could have resulted in the disintegration of  Ethiopia, with incalculable consequences on regional peace and stability.  

Despite the criminality of TPLF’s treasonous act, and the subsequent genocidal violence committed by its followers in places like Mai-Kadra, where hundreds of mostly ethnic Amharas  were massacred by retreating TPLF cadres, there has been a general reluctance by U.S. and  EU policymakers to put blame on or castigate the TPLF. Instead, a false equivalence has been  established between the TPLF and the national government of Ethiopia, and the Biden  administration has now flexed its muscles to bring the TPLF back to power at any cost. 

Disinformation and Cyberwarfare 

The TPLF has demonstrated an exceedingly superb capability in using fabricated information to  achieve its nefarious objectives since its formative days, even before the current digital  platforms were available. Despite its terrorist track records, the group had befuddled Western  policymakers, journalists and human rights organizations portraying itself as a genuine  organization that stood against repression and atrocity. For example, in one notorious and  widely reported incident in June of 1988, the TPLF lured the authoritarian government in power  into bombing the inhabitants of Howzen, a town in a rebel-controlled area, and then used the  tragic event to attract world opinion against the military dictatorship it was fighting against.  Currently, the TPLF has perfected and honed its disinformation strategy, dizzyingly using the  available technological platforms. Thanks to the billions of dollars it had siphoned off while in  power, its cadres are actively disseminating manufactured news about alleged atrocities committed in the Tigray region. Episodes of rape, genital mutilation, mass murder, use of chemical weapons, and ethnic cleansing are carefully choreographed and fed to humanitarian  organizations, journalists from major news outlets and certain policymakers from the West.  These reports are then used as evidence to substantiate policy statements and congressional  proceedings. Through false impersonation, criminals are presented as eyewitnesses or victims  of crimes, and acts of atrocities are re-enacted. In one such fabricated story, a TPLF operative  who actually resides in Boston was videotaped pretending to be a priest in Axum. In another  case, an Amnesty international report, which was alluded to in a recent U.S. State Department  statement and cited by the mainstream media, was mostly based on the accounts and  testimonials of the criminals who had executed the Mai-Kadra genocide against Amharas and  then escaped to Sudan. 

Western media have published numerous reports on the Tigray conflict that have conveniently  been used as reliable sources without regard to the neutrality of the reporters or the objectivity  and comprehensiveness of the underlying messages, either by the publishing companies or by  

agencies of the U.S. government. When Anthony Blinken testified in a Congressional hearing  declaring that there was evidence of ethnic cleansing in a region that was once forcibly annexed  by the TPLF, he was relying on a baseless report which had no evidence to back it.  

While it would be patently irresponsible to doubt there could be crimes committed in a region of  conflict such as the one in Tigray, or to suggest that such crimes should not be investigated  legalistically and journalistically, the manner of reporting by most of these correspondents, the  egregiousness of the purported crimes, and the lack of balance in the content of the reports are  too histrionic to be considered as a basis for the formulation of the foreign policy of a  Superpower. One notable example that summarizes the TPLF disinformation campaign is the  brazen remarks by Martin Plaut, a proponent of TPLF, who was caught on camera advocating  the need to manufacture the news for such news outlets as the BBC, the VOA and CNN. 

Embezzled Money in Policy Formulation 

It is no revelation that money plays a critical role in shaping U.S. policy, both domestic and  foreign. This has long been recognized and effectively used by the TPLF before and after it lost its grip to power. During the atrocious regime of Zenawi, firms such as DLA Piper were paid  huge sums of money to help stifle passages of bills in congress intended to mitigate human rights violations in the country. Currently the TPLF is deploying the billions of dollars it had embezzled while in power to rally behind its cause members of congress and other  policymakers. As acknowledged by CNN in one of its articles published on May 21, 2021, its  reports and a pro TPLF lobbying firm, Von Batten-Montague-York, were responsible in  influencing U.S. Senators to support S.Res.97.

Cronyism and Connections in Relation to Foreign Policy 

Over the three decades the TPLF was in power, it had successfully forged and nurtured  friendships with powerful officials, journalists and intellectuals in the West. Herman Cohen in  1991 brokered Meles Zenawi’s assumption of power, and he remains an ardent proponent of  TPLF causes to this date, even pleading for a safe passage to exile for TPLF leaders. In  subsequent years, a cadre of diplomats, including Susan Rice, cemented the power of the  TPLF. Leaders like Barack Obama celebrated the glory of TPLF’s dictatorship, while the regime  made a mockery of democracy declaring 100% election victory in successive ballots. TPLF friends, who are now holding critical positions in the Biden administration, are unabashedly  expressing their support for the group. Susan Rice, who once eulogized Zenawi as “selfless”,  has incessantly warned, in tweets after tweets, of imminence of severe sanctions as a  consequence of the law enforcement campaign in Tigray.  In addition to foreigners, the TPLF has implanted key members of its inner circle in strategic  positions in Western governments, and international and humanitarian organizations. According  to a Reuter’s report, for example, the WHO chief, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, has been  accused of supporting and trying to procure arms and diplomatic backing for the TPLF, of which  he is a senior member.

Toward a Pragmatic Policy on Ethiopia 

By all measures, the current policy of the U.S. State Department with regard to Ethiopia is biased, misguided and likely to lead to disastrous outcomes with far reaching consequences for  decades to come.

While sanctions can be an important tool to advance cogent policies, they can only be effective  if they are driven by cherished Western values of protecting human rights, strengthening  democratic institutions and advancing the sanctity of individualism without regard to race,  ethnicity, gender, religion or any other convictions. 

In the case of Ethiopia, imposing sanctions just to protect a criminal group, while disregarding  the overall humanitarian crises in the country, including the ongoing genocidal violence in other  regions or the crimes committed by the TPLF, is not only myopic, irresponsible and ineffective,  but also dangerously counterproductive. As such, the overarching objective of a pragmatic  policy toward Ethiopia should be to strengthen democratic institutions and secure regional  peace and stability. This would entail not only bringing to justice perpetrators of crimes, whether  in Tigray, Oromia or Benishangul-Gumuz and enforcing the rule of law, but also holding the  government in power accountable to address foundational issues, including the drafting of a  constitution that is based on the preservation of individual rights and freedoms, equality of all  Ethiopians under the law, and the establishment of a genuinely democratic society. 


If the U.S. continues in its current path of advancing an injudicious policy, guided by expensive  lobbyists, disinformation and personal connections, the end result would undoubtedly be  calamitous, that would dwarf the consequences of previous foreign policy foibles witnessed in  Libya, Yemen, Iraq and Somalia. Ethnic violence would claim the lives of millions of innocent  civilians, and the out flux of refugees would destabilize neighboring countries and strain the  resources of many European nations. The inevitable disintegration of Ethiopia would create a  fertile ground for the proliferation of extremist forces, including external groups such as Al Shabaab from Somalia, and internal ethno-nationalists, such as the Oromumma fanatic zealots.  Given the geopolitical significance of the region, the disruption created by these policies would  not be left unnoticed by emerging powers, including China, Russia and major Arab countries,  thereby creating new flashpoints for confrontation and conflict. On the U.S. domestic front, the  political and economic ramifications should not be lost on those diplomats who should have  learned hard lessons from the disastrous policies that engendered the Libyan debacle of the last  decade.

Vision Ethiopia is a 501 (c) (3) nonprofit organization incorporated in Washington, D.C. EIN 81-0729204.  Email:

Join the conversation. Like borkena on Facebook and get Ethiopian News updates regularly. As well, you may get Ethiopia News by following us on twitter @zborkena



  1. Writing on the calamity ethiopia would face if there is desanilization, is always a defeatist attitude. That is the reason anti ethiopians would want anti ethiopian tplf in power and now when the time comes to affect ethiopia. This has been done for the past 50 years. It is a journey to revenge ethiopia agsinst her independence and anti colonialusm. So rather ethiopia should struggle to have pro ethiopians. However, they ended up being victims by tiny groups which is shamefil. Even if tplf and shabia divided ethiopians ethmical regions which would be difficult, for theirown worse nightmare, the ethnic fanatics emotion will lead them to their own slavery. Tplf was monilising weyane, by making them drug dett pendent so that they can continue the pro colonizaton of ethiopia with its nile and tigray is nothing but an oxy-moron. What is triggering this war against ethiopia the pro colonial signatures and sectret alliance of Egypt, Sudan and Israel to apply their racist agenda to take over Nile so that Ethiopia remain backward. Behind the 3 countries is of course the legendary colonialists. It is amaxing how the world had becone numbed, it was just 50 years ago yhe world seemed to shame colonialism, today, pro colonialism is shiwing its face as the savior of the same people it was colonizing or attempting to colonize in the past. What a shame.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here