How Ethiopians understood Sudan’s decline to sign an agreement

Sudan held a position for too long that Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam aligns with its national interest

Sudan _ Ethiopia

borkena
May 13, 2020

With Egypt’s manifested intent to control the Nile water over 86 percent of which emanates from Ethiopia, the latter approached Sudan out of determination to start filing the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) starting July of this year.

Based on Ethiopia’s proposal, the filling of the dam could take up to ten years. The first phase of the filling is intended to end in two years and the dam gets a total of 4.9 billion cubic meters of water.



But Sudan declined to sign the agreement. The expressed position is that the agreement needs to include Egypt besides a concern for “legal and technical” issues that need to be resolved.

In a statement issued on Tuesday this week, Sudanese Irrigation Ministry said that “The Sudanese Prime Minister Abdallah Hamdok informed his Ethiopian counterpart, Abiy Ahmed of his country’s steadfast position on the need to reaching a tripartite agreement between Khartoum, Addis Ababa and Cairo, before the start of the first filling of the Renaissance Dam,” as reported by Sudan Tribune.

For the Sudanese Prime Minister, “The signing of any partial agreement for the first stage requires an agreement on the technical and legal aspects that must be included in the agreement such as the coordination mechanism, data exchange, dam safety, and environmental and social impacts.”

Sudan’s response seems to suggest that there has been a change in position. Divergent view are being discussed among Ethiopians in social media in a bid to understand Sudan’s apparent change in position while the project is in its national interest.Some say it is to early to analyse Sudan based on the decline to sign a partial agreement. Still others tend to see it in light political and economic threat that Sudan experienced from the heavy weights in the Arab League.

When Egypt mobilized members of the Arab League countries to condemn Ethiopia for not signing an agreement regarding the filling and operation of the dam, Sudan was the only country that defied signing a declaration from the League.

Not just that. In late February, Sudan did not initial US-brokered agreement saying it needs to be signed by all negotiating parties but Ethiopia was not even attending the last round of the Washington agreement.

Sudan’s decline to sign the Ethiopian proposal has triggered a conversation among Ethiopians. Political pundits are piecing together a series of events that possibly led to Sudan’s decision not to cooperate with Ethiopia.

Barely a week after Egypt and her Arab League allies were angry about Sudan’s refusal to sign declaration against Ethiopia, Sudanese Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok survived an assassination attempt in his nation’s capital, Khartoum.  Hamdok understood the attempt to be the works of “counter-revolutionaries.” The same day he tweeted: “What happened will not stop the path of change, it will be nothing but an additional push in the strong waves of the revolution.”  

Ethiopian analysts also make a reference to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates’ decision not to release pledged $2 billion dollars, among other things.

Sudan and Ethiopia are also having what seems like a border in the northwestern part of the country. The issue resurfaced recently and Egypt is believed to be, according to some Ethiopian political pundits, the one fanning it to be the point of making it conflict flashpoints. Egypt is exhausting all possible ways of ensuring water monopoly over the Nile (including stirring internal instability) while contemplating military action against the Ethiopian Dam.

According to a report by the Sudan Tribune, Sudan is pushing Ethiopia to resume talks to finalize “outstanding matter through videoconference to reach an agreement over the pending issues,” and it remains to be a question if such a controversial topic could be solved through a virtual negotiation process. Ethiopian PM Abiy Ahmed’s administration was actively involved in the transition process in post-Albashir Sudan and has contributed to resolving differences between political forces in the country. It remains to be seen if he is capable of resolving the difference between Ethiopia and Sudan amid presumable financial and political pressure from Arab League countries.

On the other hand, the US pressure on Ethiopia seems to be continuing as the former wants the latter to conclude US-brokered negotiation before starting to fill the dam.



Join the conversation. Like borkena on Facebook and get Ethiopian News updates regularly. As well, you may get Ethiopia News by following us on twitter @zborkena

7 Responses to "How Ethiopians understood Sudan’s decline to sign an agreement"

  1. Ittu Aba Farda   May 14, 2020 at 12:26 am

    Poor boy Sudan has always been a toy on Egypt’s playbook. When Egypt finds out when Sudan is out of line it makes sure Sudan gets its attention. Remember modern day Sudan was founded with a blessing from Al-Qahirah. When Prime Minister Abdalla went behaving badly at the Arab League walkie talkie mumbo jumbo session, the earth went violently rumbling beneath his feet. That has got his attention. It seems he has been on leash since then. He did an about-face in heartbeat. Didn’t he? Poor boy!!!! His own military is breathing its dragon breath over his shoulder every second of it. The generals there are watching his every step of the way. They are veterans of the same history with the generals of Egypt: Rulers of their countries. I wouldn’t be surprised if they decide to make a move on him at any time henceforth. O’ Poor Boy!!!!

    Reply
  2. Metawesha   May 14, 2020 at 4:36 am

    Prosperity Party is using GERD to spread false hope and fear. The Psychopath prosperity Ethiopian government signed in USA saying “Ethiopia , Sudan and Egypt will reach an agreement by January the 15th 2020″ which was a huge mistake. it would have at least been better if the Ethiopian government said ” will put an effort to reach an agreement” , but no what they said was ” will reach an agreement.” Typical Prosperity doctrine survives by creating false hope and fear . The true real fear Ethiopians are facing now is s how long Ethiopia is going to be represented by a psychopath, but to cover the real fear prosperity created a false fear .

    Signing something and not living up to what was signed , is about to become what Ethiopia is being known for in the worldstage due to EPRDF .

    christiantoday . com › article
    Prosperity gospel makes people have ‘false hope and fear’, says Benny …

    christiantoday.com/article/prosperity-gospel-makes-people-have-false-hope-and-fear-says-benny-hinns-nephew/133111.htm

    Reply
  3. Akaleguzaye   May 14, 2020 at 7:49 am

    Eritrean activists sue European Union ( EU )
    for funding roads built with ‘forced labour’

    zehabesha.com/eritrean-activists-sue-eu-for-funding-roads-built-with-forced-labour/

    Reply
    • wedi   May 15, 2020 at 5:29 pm

      aye anchi POOR agame, let it be then, if it makes you feel good while you are sinking, let it be!!

      Reply
  4. Yohannes Tarekegn   May 15, 2020 at 2:46 pm

    Dear Metawesha,your matching of the prosperity gospel’s false hope and fear couldn’t match with the prosperity party’s statement of the current situations about the GERD!
    Everyone who has healthy mind can understand the real bad situations that are happening concerning the GERD.
    In addition to that the EPP is much different and better than the EPRDF!

    Reply
  5. Abwaan Ahmed   May 16, 2020 at 2:04 pm

    Just like many other Arab countries’ leaders, Al Abashire was a despot. Nevertheless, he will be remembered for one Nobel achievement forever. He Uncaged Sudan from the despicable Egyptian bondage. Now he is gone, Sudan is about to become an Egyptian tyrant generals playground. It’s quite pathetic.

    Reply
  6. rezen   May 17, 2020 at 3:10 pm

    Subject: “How Ethiopians understood Sudan’s decline to sign an agreement” borkena
    May 13, 2020

    Commentary, 17 My 2020
    Absurd [or even shocking] as it may sound, Egypt — as led by the present President — will continue to be bully adamantly, hence assuring the crisis between the two countries (Egypt-Ethiopia) continue until the President of Egypt is very old and too senile to even manage dressing by himself. At that stage, he would not care about the friction between the two countries. What mattered was his life style and consequential abundant benefit for being a President.

    As to the Big Power being behind the Leader of Egypt, one is tempted to say (with reasonable political forecast) that it is only temporary — not more than half a year! As for Ethiopia, it has no choice but to take responsible action for the crucial benefit of the Ethiopian People via the proper management as well as being conscious of neighbourhood’s interest of the Blue Nile — a resource that is within its territory. It is unthinkable that Ethiopia — with its rich History — simply be a “carpet” for Egypt’s Leadership to clean its ‘shoes’ at its wanton desire. and be a custodian of Ethiopian territory and natural resources!!! This is NOT acceptable by ANY standard >>> unless it is based on other factor that denigrates the dignity and interest of the victim i.e. the PROUD BLACK AFRICAN RACE — in this case, ETHIOPIA. THE END

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.